The Galaxy S23 Ultra may have a powerful algorithm, but its treatment of the Moon in its photos is too artificial. It replaces the Moon with pre-existing images, resulting in an overly processed image that lacks authenticity. This new photo processing technique may seem impressive at first glance, but it falls short of delivering genuine and accurate depictions of the Moon. As consumers, we should demand authenticity and transparency from our technology, and settle for nothing less. It raises the question of whether this is a photo processing technique that goes too far.
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra had an almost flawless reputation, with exceptional features and top-notch performance. Despite minor issues with screen precision and charging speed, the smartphone delivered great performance, an impressive display, long battery life, and stunning photography. However, recent evidence shared by a Reddit user has shed light on the fact that some of the phone’s captivating photos may have been digitally enhanced or edited, raising concerns about the authenticity of the phone’s camera capabilities.
Samsung Offers In-Depth Clarification on S23 Ultra’s Lunar Photography Mechanism.
According to the allegation, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra’s algorithm doesn’t just enhance the Moon in photos but replaces it with another image altogether to create a deceptive illusion.
A Reddit user’s experiment has raised questions about the authenticity of the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra’s Moon photos. The user, ibreakphotos, recreated the Moon in his room and took a low-quality photo of it. He then took a picture of the same photo displayed on his monitor using the S23 Ultra’s camera, creating a simulated Moon shot. The phone’s algorithm generated an image that was far more detailed and precise than the original photo, suggesting that the algorithm had replaced the original image with a pre-existing high-resolution one.
This experiment highlights the potential for photo manipulation in smartphone cameras and the need for transparency in the technology. Users should be aware of the possibility of artificially enhanced images and consider the ethical implications of relying on technology to create seemingly authentic photos.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s photo of the Moon on the right, although aesthetically pleasing, was found to be inaccurate. The algorithm added artificial details that did not exist in the original image, such as craters that were barely visible in the deteriorated image used as reference.
Following the previous demonstration of photo manipulation on the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, ibreakphotos has created another image to further illustrate the phone’s AI algorithm’s behavior. The new image features a star duplicated in the frame, with the algorithm applying its enhancement to only one instance of the star, resulting in a clear and detailed star and a blurred duplicate.
The blurred portion of the image represents what the camera can capture without the AI algorithm’s intervention, while the other part of the image showcases the algorithm’s artificial improvement of the photo.
Interestingly, the orange tint that appeared in the previous demonstration of the Moon photo is not a result of manipulation, but rather a result of the conditions in which the photo was taken. This observation supports the idea that the algorithm does not merely replace the original photo with an existing high-resolution image of the Moon but actively alters and enhances the photo taken by the phone.
Is Samsung’s Algorithm-based Machine Learning Technology Ignoring User Preferences for Photography ?
Samsung’s algorithm-based machine learning technology has been put into question after this online demonstration showed its potential to go too far. In this example experienced by ibreakphotos, a source image not of the Moon was put through Samsung’s treatment and recreated with artificial improvements that went beyond the capabilities of the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s camera. While the resulting photo was detailed, it did not reflect reality.
This brings up a debate that has been ongoing since the dawn of smartphones: do users want a beautiful image of the Moon, even if it doesn’t reflect the true capabilities of their camera, or do they want a real photo, even if it’s fuzzy and unpresentable? It can be assumed that the majority of consumers who use a smartphone to photograph the Moon prefer the detailed but false photo offered by the AI.
However, Samsung is at fault for not allowing users to adjust the software processing effects that they wish to use. The demonstration of the two moons shows that Samsung can offer a photo close to reality or not, but this should be an option. Users should be able to choose between the detailed but artificial photo or the fuzzy but true-to-life photo, depending on their preferences.
While Samsung has trained its algorithm on hundreds of photos of the Moon to give it the objective to achieve through the proposed treatments, it seems to have overlooked the importance of user customization. It is up to Samsung to provide options for its users, rather than forcing them to accept a photo that may not reflect their preferences.
It is essential that smartphone manufacturers take into account user preferences and provide options that cater to their needs. While artificial improvements can enhance the quality of an image, they should not be the only option available. Consumers deserve to have a say in the final product, especially when it comes to something as personal as capturing memories through photography.
0 Comments