Silicon Valley Bank’s Bankruptcy Could Devastate the Tech Industry’s Start-Up Ecosystem


Start-ups and private equity funds are facing a financial disaster as the Silicon Valley Bank has filed for bankruptcy, hindering the withdrawal of tens of billions of dollars deposited by them. This has triggered concerns of a possible ripple effect in the tech industry, causing widespread panic among investors.

SVB was the financial partner of the innovation economy, providing support and guidance to tech and life sciences companies backed by American investors. They were known for their deep understanding of the entrepreneurial community, helping to recruit talent and advise new leaders, making them a true partner unlike any other. Their reputation for expertise and support made them a go-to choice for startups and private equity funds.

However, with SVB now under the control of the American regulator FDIC, the future of these clients’ funds is uncertain. While the bank’s orderly liquidation process allows for up to $250,000 per customer to be recovered, the uninsured portion of deposits makes up a staggering 96% of the total $173 billion entrusted to the institution, according to the bank’s annual report. The fate of these uninsured funds is now tied to the uncertain process of selling off the bank’s assets.

The impact of SVB’s collapse goes far beyond individual customers. As a key financial partner for the innovation economy, their demise raises questions about the stability and health of the entire tech and life sciences industry. Without a reliable financial partner, startups and private equity funds may struggle to secure the funding and support they need to continue innovating and driving growth. The loss of SVB is a stark reminder of the crucial role that financial institutions play in fueling innovation and growth, and the need for a stable and reliable banking sector to support the economy as a whole.

What possible impact ?

The recent demise of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) has sent shockwaves through the tech community and beyond. As activist investor Bill Ackman pointed out, the collapse of SVB could have a devastating impact on the long-term prospects of the economy, with private equity-backed companies relying heavily on the bank for loans and cash. If no other financial institution steps in to take control of SVB, Ackman argues that a public rescue should be considered.

While some may argue that a rescue of SVB would amount to bailing out the “richest 1%”, this fails to recognize the broader implications of the bank’s collapse. As co-founder of the video platform Capsule, Champ Bennett, noted on Twitter, the $5 million injected into his company during its first fundraising was housed at SVB and is now inaccessible. And he is not alone. Many other tech entrepreneurs are similarly affected, and the impact of SVB’s collapse will be felt throughout the industry.

Alternative investment companies (hedge funds) have stepped in to offer to replace the bank and immediately disburse funds to SVB client companies. However, this does not address the larger issue of the vulnerability of the financial system. The collapse of two banks in a matter of hours, SVB and Silvergate Bank, is a reminder that banks are not infallible and that we need to be prepared for such eventualities.

Some may argue that decentralized finance (DeFi), an alternative financial system based on cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, is a safer option than traditional banking. However, as entrepreneur and investor Arjun Sethi pointed out on Twitter, the recent events show that banks are still a better and safer option than DeFi.

It is clear that the collapse of SVB is a serious issue that demands urgent attention. A public rescue may be necessary to prevent further damage to the economy, and steps must be taken to ensure that such failures do not occur in the future. The tech community, in particular, must come together to find solutions and support one another through these challenging times.

DISCLAIMER
Investments in cryptocurrencies are risky. How-then is not responsible for the quality of the products or services presented on this page and could not be held responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused following the use of a good or service highlighted in this article. Investments related to crypto-assets are risky by nature, readers should do their own research before taking any action and only invest within the limits of their financial capabilities. This article does not constitute investment advice.
AMF recommendations. There is no guaranteed high return, a product with high return potential involves high risk. This risk-taking must be in line with your project, your investment horizon and your ability to lose part of this savings. Do not invest if you are not ready to lose all or part of your capital.

0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *